Thanks D.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I'll delete them all except for the comet rewrite branch when I > have the chance. > > Cheers, > Ethan > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am not working in any of the branches.. >> >> /Anne >> >> On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how >>> prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly >>> after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science >>> project' for himself, in one of his replies. >>> >>> We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an >>> upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on >>> the feature. >>> >>> Imtiaz >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM >>> Subject: Re: Branch cleanup >>> >>> >>>> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from >>>> these branches? >>>> >>>> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it >>>> anymore..... >>>> >>>> I'm fine with deleting the other ones. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> .0/ >>>>> lift-2.2/ >>>>> metadata/ >>>>> pubsubhubbub/ >>>>> pubsubhubbub-2/ >>>>> update_box_redesign/ >>> >>> >> >
