Ok, I'll delete them all except for the comet rewrite branch when I have the chance.
Cheers, Ethan On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not working in any of the branches.. > > /Anne > > On 3 April 2011 13:58, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <[email protected]> wrote: >> I did practically nothing on that branch before I had questions about how >> prevalent and therefore how necessary pubsubhubub was for ESME particularly >> after the originator Ethan said, that he kind of started it a 'science >> project' for himself, in one of his replies. >> >> We should just go ahead and delete that branch. We can always create an >> upto-date one in the future, if I or someone else decides to resume work on >> the feature. >> >> Imtiaz >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Ethan Jewett" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 5:01 PM >> Subject: Re: Branch cleanup >> >> >>> what about the pubsubhubbub branches? can we use any of code from >>> these branches? >>> >>> I don't know how far Imtiaz got or whether we should even support it >>> anymore..... >>> >>> I'm fine with deleting the other ones. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> .0/ >>>> lift-2.2/ >>>> metadata/ >>>> pubsubhubbub/ >>>> pubsubhubbub-2/ >>>> update_box_redesign/ >> >> >
