+1 Built and ran tests successfully Verified signatures and checksums Validated licenses
One thing we should do going forward is to add some attention calling sequence – like a line full of ‘*’ to point to the fact that CHANGES.txt does not have changes from Release 0.10 onwards. Thanks Balu for driving the release and working through the issues Thanks Venkat On 8/2/16, 4:32 PM, "Balu Vellanki Bala" <bvella...@hortonworks.com> wrote: Hello Everyone, This is the call for vote for the following Release Candidate RC2 to be released as official Apache Falcon 0.10 release. This RC2 addressed all feedback provided for RC0, plus fixed bugs FALCON-2104 and FALCON-2107 found in RC0/RC1. The source tar ball, signature and checksum files can be downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/falcon/apache-falcon-0.10-sources/ You can find the signing key here : http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xF743ABF42E887C76 You can find the KEYS file here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/falcon/KEYS To verify signature: gpg --verify apache-falcon-0.10-sources.tar.gz.asc apache-falcon-0.10-sources.tar.gz Git tag commit-id for the release : release-0.10-rc2 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=falcon.git;a=commit;h=dc4129598d9 afed9ca9e4210d7c04f80e458ff3f We have closed around several JIRAs as part of this release, the details of which can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12334758&sty leName=Html&projectId=12314429 Please find the release notes with brief explanation on key changes at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12821716/FalconReleaseNote s-0.10.pdf Note: The hyper link ³migration instructions² under section-5 is set to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/falcon/site/0.10/MigrationInstructions.htm l, this link will only be available post release, once the Falcon documentation site is updated. At this moment, it will not work. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Please vote on releasing this RC2 [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) +1 from my side Thank you Balu Vellanki