Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I'd say the most known use case is axis, where all packages are > org.apache.axis(2) and still is a subproject of web services. > The list includes most of the webservices TLP, mina subprojects, etc... Args, yes, I tend to forget all this WS stuff :)
> I'd rather go with org.apache.karaf myself. I'm not against this - I'm just not sure what the better option is :) > It would avoid any > required renaming if ever going to TLP (I can see subprojects being > org.apache.xxx, but i don't really see a TLP using > org.apache.anothertlp.xxx). And unless we use the existing felix > resources (jira, confluence, etc...) it would be more consistent. Hmm, right if Karaf is using it's own jira, confluence etc...hmm... > Most of the big subprojects have their own mailing list too. I don't > really think we need this at this point, but my point is just to > express the fact that subprojects can have a real identity. I think > it mostly depends on the "size" of the subprojectm and my thinking is > that Karaf is big enough to deserve its own identity, even as a > subproject. I tend to agree here. And we are used to this already, everyone speaks about Apache iPojo, but I've never seen Apache Felix iPojo. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
