On Apr 24, 2009, at 16:13 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
So how do we get this resolved quickly? A majority vote?
I'm in favor of treating Karaf like any other existing subproject in Felix for now, because I value consistency here.
Treating subprojects within Felix in a different way is another issue, which should be dealt with separately.
However, I can imagine that with Karaf already having some history at ServiceMix, changing package names (or bundle symbolic names) has certain implications on compatibility, and that might be a good reason to deviate from the standard in certain places.
Greetings, Marcel
