Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 4/24/09 7:55 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> And we are used to this already, everyone speaks about Apache iPojo, but >> I've never seen Apache Felix iPojo. >> > > That is completely false. Look at our subproject page:
Great, I stand corrected :) But people outside of Apache refer to it as Apache iPojo :) - ok, you can't teach everyone and people usually just say Felix although it's Apache Felix etc. > Of course, I accept we can make a different decision in this case, but I > just want to be clear that I have certainly tried to be precise up until > now that our subprojects are part of Apache Felix. > > Otherwise, why don't we create org.apache.log, org.apache.ipojo, > org.apache.http, org.apache.upnp... > Good point; actually I was thinking about this for iPojo..äh..Apache Felix iPojo for some minutes. So how do we get this resolved quickly? A majority vote? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
