Hi, This would certainly be a very valuable addition, but I don't think this should stop us from continuing.
Regards Felix Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > Looked quickly at cometd and especially cometd-java. It looks to me that > this is trivial to include in the http service implementation. Will look > into this. > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sten Roger Sandvik <s...@x3m.com> wrote: > >> The new http service is not testet alot. It's only been used in our own >> projects for now, but I will need to create more unit tests and some >> integration tests. As for comet support - I have tought of it, but have not >> come around to do it. I will gladly look at the "current" comet support to >> see if it's a trivial ting to include. >> >> Yes, it would be great to be included as a committer. I really like the >> Felix project and are really committed to create the best http service >> implementation out there :-) >> >> BR, >> Sten Roger >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Rob Walker <r...@ascert.com> wrote: >> >>> Good point - we also have a "home grown" cometd approach which we use for >>> server push to our GWT application, so something built into the http server >>> would definitely be of interest >>> - R >>> >>> >>> Clement Escoffier wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Just my 2 cents. >>>> any plan to support Cometd ? >>>> >>>> We slightly change the current HTTP Service to support Cometd. I don't >>>> see any issue to do the same on Sten's version. >>>> (of course, I can send what we quickly did). >>>> >>>> >>>> As a reminder, Cometd is an HTTP based MOM, allowing (after a handshake) >>>> a server to notify browser. In Ajax-based interaction, the client >>>> (periodically) query the server. With Comet, the server notifies the >>>> clients. >>>> As you can imagine, this is definitely important for dynamic web >>>> application. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Clement >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28.08.2009, at 08:40, Rob Walker wrote: >>>> >>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>>>> >>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and code >>>>> >>>>> >From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility >>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be wrong >>>>> and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks anything >>>>> present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll either be >>>>> fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the current service - >>>>> so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be able to advise other >>>>> Felix guys of anything that might differ and need application changes. >>>>> I'm >>>>> happy to make time to look at this next week. >>>>> >>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need to >>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>>>> >>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty >>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller solution >>>>> >>>>> -- Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge >>> r...@ascert.com >>> +44 (0)20 7488 3470 >>> www.ascert.com >>> >>> >
