Our application uses cometd so including this would be a welcomed
feature.


Tim Moloney             The  reasonable  man adapts  himself  to
MRSL                    the world; the unreasonable one persists
2015 Cattlemen Road     in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Sarasota, FL  34232     Therefore  all progress  depends on  the
(941) 377-6775 x208     unreasonable man.    George Bernard Shaw

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sten Roger Sandvik [mailto:s...@x3m.com] 
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 03:27
> To: dev@felix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Felix HttpService improvement...
> 
> Looked quickly at cometd and especially cometd-java. It looks 
> to me that
> this is trivial to include in the http service 
> implementation. Will look
> into this.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sten Roger Sandvik 
> <s...@x3m.com> wrote:
> 
> > The new http service is not testet alot. It's only been 
> used in our own
> > projects for now, but I will need to create more unit tests and some
> > integration tests. As for comet support - I have tought of 
> it, but have not
> > come around to do it. I will gladly look at the "current" 
> comet support to
> > see if it's a trivial ting to include.
> >
> > Yes, it would be great to be included as a committer. I 
> really like the
> > Felix project and are really committed to create the best 
> http service
> > implementation out there :-)
> >
> > BR,
> > Sten Roger
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Rob Walker <r...@ascert.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Good point - we also have a "home grown" cometd approach 
> which we use for
> >> server push to our GWT application, so something built 
> into the http server
> >> would definitely be of interest
> >> - R
> >>
> >>
> >> Clement Escoffier wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Just my 2 cents.
> >>> any plan to support Cometd ?
> >>>
> >>> We slightly change the current HTTP Service to support 
> Cometd. I don't
> >>> see any issue to do the same on Sten's version.
> >>> (of course, I can send what we quickly did).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As a reminder, Cometd is an HTTP based MOM, allowing 
> (after a handshake)
> >>> a server to notify browser. In Ajax-based interaction, the client
> >>> (periodically) query the server. With Comet, the server 
> notifies the
> >>> clients.
> >>> As you can imagine, this is definitely important for dynamic web
> >>> application.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Clement
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 28.08.2009, at 08:40, Rob Walker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  What do we need to do make this happen guys?
> >>>>
> >>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos.
> >>>>
> >>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the 
> approach and code
> >>>>
> >>>> >From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" 
> compatibility
> >>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new 
> service would be wrong
> >>>> and the current one right, just whether thenew version 
> breaks anything
> >>>> present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure 
> it'll either be
> >>>> fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the 
> current service -
> >>>> so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be able 
> to advise other
> >>>> Felix guys of anything that might differ and need 
> application changes.  I'm
> >>>> happy to make time to look at this next week.
> >>>>
> >>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, 
> we also need to
> >>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance?
> >>>>
> >>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has 
> served us pretty
> >>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner 
> and fuller solution
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Rob
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
> >> r...@ascert.com
> >> +44 (0)20 7488 3470
> >> www.ascert.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> 

Reply via email to