Great. I am on a vacation right now, but when I'm back I will make available the code and binaries so that others can play with it.
// srs On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>wrote: > On 7/28/09 2:44 AM, Rob Walker wrote: > >> We're a big user of the current felix Jetty http. >> >> Would definitely welcome any improvement/enhancement - personally I'd like >> to see it as a parallel implementation initially, so we can look at both >> side by side. And then later, if/when everyone is happy and has moved across >> then we could look to deprecate the existing one. >> >> My motives are purely selfish here - we have a lot of live users on the >> current implementation, and have had a couple of issues in the past where >> changes broke these implementations. So it'd be good to be able to stage any >> migration. >> > > Even if we replace the existing impl, the old binary and source releases do > not go away, so no one would be forced to upgrade before they were > ready...of course, if there is some irreconcilable incompatibility between > the two then we'd have an issue, but I doubt that would be the case since > they are supposed to be implementing the same spec. > > Well, it sounds like there is sufficient interest, so it would be great if > Sten could make it available for people to play with via JIRA. > > What do you think, Sten? > > -> richard > > > >> On the plus note - although our usage is quite basic, we do stick strictly >> to what OSGi exposes as the HttpService API layer and use no other features. >> So we make quite a good test site to ensure the fundamentals of the base API >> are working as per the spec. >> >> Regards >> >> -- Rob >> >> >>
