2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:47, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > > > > Ok, let me know when the request has been created (so that I can try to > > > push > > > it). > > > > > > > well at the moment I'm trying to get Peter set up with: > > > > http://nexus.sonatype.org/oss-repository-hosting.html > > > > but I honestly don't know how long it will take, depends how busy Peter > is > > > > Would it be easier to do as indicated at > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html#Syncing_your_own_repository_to_the_central_repository_automatically > This avoids the need to switch to nexus, use new repositories, etc... > It just need to upload the maven key to his server to allow ssh access. >
both Carlos and I have pointed Peter to that a number of times in the past and nothing has happened also switching over to Nexus isn't actually much work, the Felix project switched over earlier this year and our release process became much simpler - but it's really up to Peter to decide which he prefers > > > > so if you want to go ahead and open a manual upload request for 0.0.356 > in > > parallel at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD please feel free > > > > the artifacts that we need uploaded can be found here: > > > > http://www.aqute.biz/repo/biz/aQute/bndlib/0.0.356/ > > > > I will. > thanks > > > > -- > > Cheers, Stuart > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:03, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Why is there a need to wait for bnd to be in central given that the > > > > source > > > > > code is included in the bundle plugin project ? > > > > > Is that just temporary ? > > > > > > > > > > > > yes - Peter has his own Maven repo for Bnd, but unfortunately this is > > not > > > > sync'd to central > > > > (I've suggested he sets up sync'ing a number of times, but this is > not > > > high > > > > on his todo list) > > > > > > > > we don't use Peter's repository in the bundleplugin pom.xml because > > it's > > > > not > > > > good practice > > > > (the additional repository would then get hit for all maven > artifacts, > > > not > > > > just the bnd groupId) > > > > > > > > previously I've got Carlos to upload the artifact manually, but this > > gets > > > > very tiresome during > > > > development which is why I decided to just put a copy of the source > > there > > > > at > > > > the moment > > > > > > > > if we released the plugin with this source then you wouldn't be able > to > > > > override the bnd > > > > version during the build (because there's no dependency) and it makes > > > > things > > > > messy > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also did anyone asked for the new version to be > > > > > put in central already ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was just about to - there's been a few regressions in the recent > > > builds, > > > > but Peter has > > > > just blessed 0.0.356 as a good build. Bear in mind that a manual > upload > > > to > > > > central can > > > > take a while, depending who's available to do the upload (which is > why > > > sync > > > > is better). > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:36, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've tried to release gogo this morning and after fixing a few > > > > things, > > > > > > i've > > > > > > > badly hit FELIX-1262 which is actually fixed in the latest > > snapshot > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > maven bundle plugin. > > > > > > > Is this plugin in a state to be released now ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no it's not in a state to be released - for one we want to move > to > > > the > > > > > > latest bndlib (and first we need that available on central) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can try to release it unless somebody is willing to do it. > > What > > > > > would > > > > > > be > > > > > > > the version to use ? 2.0.1, 2.0.2 ? Not sure to have a good > > > > > > understanding > > > > > > > of the version scheme with odd/even numbers for minor releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 08:25, Guillaume Nodet < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to release a first version of Gogo. > > > > > > > > However, given the RFC is bound to change and that we might > > > > introduce > > > > > > > > other changes that will break the syntax, I wonder if we > should > > > use > > > > a > > > > > > > > 0.2.0 version instead of 1.0.0. > > > > > > > > In addition, we will release the org.osgi.service.command > > package > > > > > > > > which is not official, so I think keeping a version < 1.0.0 > > makes > > > > > > > > sense until a spec is released for that. > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > > > > Open Source SOA > > > > > > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > > > Open Source SOA > > > > > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Cheers, Stuart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > Open Source SOA > > > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cheers, Stuart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > ------------------------ > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > ------------------------ > > > Open Source SOA > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Cheers, Stuart
