The latest bnd version is now available in central:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/biz/aQute/bndlib/0.0.357/
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:03, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
>
> > Why is there a need to wait for bnd to be in central given that the
> source
> > code is included in the bundle plugin project ?
> > Is that just temporary ?
>
>
> yes - Peter has his own Maven repo for Bnd, but unfortunately this is not
> sync'd to central
> (I've suggested he sets up sync'ing a number of times, but this is not high
> on his todo list)
>
> we don't use Peter's repository in the bundleplugin pom.xml because it's
> not
> good practice
> (the additional repository would then get hit for all maven artifacts, not
> just the bnd groupId)
>
> previously I've got Carlos to upload the artifact manually, but this gets
> very tiresome during
> development which is why I decided to just put a copy of the source there
> at
> the moment
>
> if we released the plugin with this source then you wouldn't be able to
> override the bnd
> version during the build (because there's no dependency) and it makes
> things
> messy
>
>
> > Also did anyone asked for the new version to be
> > put in central already ?
> >
>
> I was just about to - there's been a few regressions in the recent builds,
> but Peter has
> just blessed 0.0.356 as a good build. Bear in mind that a manual upload to
> central can
> take a while, depending who's available to do the upload (which is why sync
> is better).
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:36, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > I've tried to release gogo this morning and after fixing a few
> things,
> > > i've
> > > > badly hit FELIX-1262 which is actually fixed in the latest snapshot
> of
> > > the
> > > > maven bundle plugin.
> > > > Is this plugin in a state to be released now ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > no it's not in a state to be released - for one we want to move to the
> > > latest bndlib (and first we need that available on central)
> > >
> > >
> > > > I can try to release it unless somebody is willing to do it. What
> > would
> > > be
> > > > the version to use ? 2.0.1, 2.0.2 ? Not sure to have a good
> > > understanding
> > > > of the version scheme with odd/even numbers for minor releases.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 08:25, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'd like to release a first version of Gogo.
> > > > > However, given the RFC is bound to change and that we might
> introduce
> > > > > other changes that will break the syntax, I wonder if we should use
> a
> > > > > 0.2.0 version instead of 1.0.0.
> > > > > In addition, we will release the org.osgi.service.command package
> > > > > which is not official, so I think keeping a version < 1.0.0 makes
> > > > > sense until a spec is released for that.
> > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > > ------------------------
> > > > > Open Source SOA
> > > > > http://fusesource.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > > > ------------------------
> > > > Open Source SOA
> > > > http://fusesource.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers, Stuart
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > ------------------------
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
