I think that sounds interesting. I'm sure we will have a Log 1.4 implementation eventually and this might be handy no matter what.
Advertising
Is this available somewhere already to look at? regards, Karl On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm wondering if there would be interest in the felix project to accept and > host a small integration between the upcoming Log 1.4 specification with > Logback backend. > > The features I have already are: > > - single bundle impl > - generic LogListener that attempts to be the shortest path from the log > record (LogEntry) creation to the Logback appenders (no intermediaries) > - fully integrates all the record details like location, stackframes, etc. > - allows Logback to manage levels for legacy framework, service and bundle > events in a granular fashion by using canonical logger names > - can react to Logback scan (i.e. autoupdate) to dynamically apply level > changes using the new LoggingAdmin > - fully supports all other logback configuration goodness > - makes it very simply pipe all the various Log APIs to the same appenders > (or not) using the same formats (or not) and control all their log levels > in one place: slf4j is native, but I've tested with log4j 1.2/2.x, > commons-logging, JUL, jboss-logging in the same framework > > Of course Felix doesn't have a Log 1.4 impl yet so that is a consideration. > > This small integration has solved so many of the rather bothersome logging > issues I've been suffering the past years and I'd like to share it with > others. > > Sincerely, > -- > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) > Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance) -- Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com
