> On 15-Jan-2021, at 10:04 PM, Paul Aphivantrakul <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> To a newcomer doing a fintech startup, does the community recommend starting
> with the Fineract 1.x software or the Fineract CN software? I would say that
> to me, security and maturity of the software are more important than having a
> large and rich set of features as my startup will likely focus on offering a
> limited set of financial services at the beginning. I have also noticed that
> there is a lot more documentation for Fineract 1.x and also a lot more
> developers contributing to the Fineract 1.x repository than on the Fineract
> CN repository. At this point, I am leaning more towards using Fineract 1.x,
> but I also like the modular aspect of Fineract CN.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Paul
Hey Paul, its fair to say Fineract CN is dead , the one who will say that its
not are promoting invalid information, I would nothing on facts but just talks.
We have started the work over migrating these service keeping in mind for
inbuilt security with key focus on developer ready.
The key idea is that any FI could develop in any lang or framework can utilise
the today framework like we have in built consensus layer that keeps the data
consistency in place.
Its easier for payment rails to utilise such logs that are immutable.
Yeah I think Fineract 1.x is there its more solid then Fineract CN .
If you wish to have more discussion around technology that works for practical
use case reach out to me.
Thanks
