Is there a fork of fineract 1.x that is actively developed?
================================ Giancarlo Angulo www.onthe8spot.com ================================ On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 6:00 PM Saransh Sharma <sara...@muellners.org> wrote: > > > > On 15-Jan-2021, at 10:04 PM, Paul Aphivantrakul <aphivantra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > To a newcomer doing a fintech startup, does the community recommend > starting with the Fineract 1.x software or the Fineract CN software? I > would say that to me, security and maturity of the software are more > important than having a large and rich set of features as my startup will > likely focus on offering a limited set of financial services at the > beginning. I have also noticed that there is a lot more documentation for > Fineract 1.x and also a lot more developers contributing to the Fineract > 1.x repository than on the Fineract CN repository. At this point, I am > leaning more towards using Fineract 1.x, but I also like the modular aspect > of Fineract CN. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Paul > > Hey Paul, its fair to say Fineract CN is dead , the one who will say that > its not are promoting invalid information, I would nothing on facts but > just talks. > > We have started the work over migrating these service keeping in mind for > inbuilt security with key focus on developer ready. > > The key idea is that any FI could develop in any lang or framework can > utilise the today framework like we have in built consensus layer that > keeps the data consistency in place. > > Its easier for payment rails to utilise such logs that are immutable. > > Yeah I think Fineract 1.x is there its more solid then Fineract CN . > > If you wish to have more discussion around technology that works for > practical use case reach out to me. > > Thanks
