Thank you everyone for your responses. Paul
> On Jan 16, 2021, at 10:23 PM, Giancarlo Angulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thank you for the information. will study with care. > > Thanks > ================================ > Giancarlo Angulo > www.onthe8spot.com > ================================ > > >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:47 PM Ankit Muellner <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey Giancarlo, >> >> The decision analysis over Fineract 1.x and CN is routinely asked by our >> client case studies at Muellners. There is relevant information over this >> analysis, that our research team did. >> https://docs.fineract.net/fineract-versions/fineract-1.x-vs-fineract-cn >> >> >>Fineract 1.x is a mature platform (matured since 2018 releases for sure) >> >>being maintained by members of this community. Apache Fineract 1.x & CN >> >>are the only platforms that this community endorses. The documentation and >> >>GitHub repos are maintained by Apache FSF. One is mature while other is >> >>pre-release. >> >> https://github.com/apache/fineract >> >> Notably, it's a great strategy to START with Fineract 1.x as it can >> highlight features using the Mifos X client Web app. >> >> However, >> 1. Your Gap analysis should bring clarity for you as each implementation has >> a distinctive character. >> 2. You should take this decision based on factors guiding the transformation >> efforts & objectives, (that your MFI client has) and your own technical >> understanding of both versions' design principles. >> >> Note: I have observed many FIs having great difficulty in upgrading their >> Fineract services if a versioning plan is not in place during the >> implementation's foundation steps. This usually happens when Fineract is not >> the core platform and only handles a few IT components of a bank or MFI. E.g >> if your MFI is into lending, and you plan to use only lending management on >> Fineract while Loan origination is on a different platform. In this example, >> your implementation will face difficulty over both the short and the long >> term. >> >> If you decide to evaluate CN (say you have a 1-2 year plan in place): >> >> As Saransh pointed, community efforts on CN are practically non-existent >> >> currently. Then you can look for promoting development on CN. >> >> As Georgia pointed out, there is a significant improvement event under >> >> the title Finscale. This event started as a possible upgrade off Fineract >> >> CN last year, was presented at Apache Con 2020, and has become a lot more >> >> now. You should reach out to Saransh for more information on this. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> >>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021, 14:47 Giancarlo Angulo, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thank you for your response. >>> >>> I am still studying the codebase. >>> >>> I am helping a friend out with a cooperative/microfinance company he is >>> involved with. >>> >>> found Mifos and am currently exploring local configuration for our country >>> and the institution type. >>> >>> I hope I can contribute to the code base in the future. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> ================================ >>> Giancarlo Angulo >>> www.onthe8spot.com >>> ================================ >>> >>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:36 PM Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> Giancarlo, >>>> Fineract 1.x is the best option that you have. >>>> https://github.com/apache/fineract >>>> Correctly maintained ad deployed in production. >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Giorgio. >>>> >>>> >>>>> El sáb, 16 ene 2021 a las 12:19, Giancarlo Angulo (<[email protected]>) >>>>> escribió: >>>>> Is there a fork of fineract 1.x that is actively developed? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ================================ >>>>> Giancarlo Angulo >>>>> www.onthe8spot.com >>>>> ================================ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 6:00 PM Saransh Sharma <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > On 15-Jan-2021, at 10:04 PM, Paul Aphivantrakul >>>>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hello, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > To a newcomer doing a fintech startup, does the community recommend >>>>>> > starting with the Fineract 1.x software or the Fineract CN software? I >>>>>> > would say that to me, security and maturity of the software are more >>>>>> > important than having a large and rich set of features as my startup >>>>>> > will likely focus on offering a limited set of financial services at >>>>>> > the beginning. I have also noticed that there is a lot more >>>>>> > documentation for Fineract 1.x and also a lot more developers >>>>>> > contributing to the Fineract 1.x repository than on the Fineract CN >>>>>> > repository. At this point, I am leaning more towards using Fineract >>>>>> > 1.x, but I also like the modular aspect of Fineract CN. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thank you, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Paul >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey Paul, its fair to say Fineract CN is dead , the one who will say >>>>>> that its not are promoting invalid information, I would nothing on facts >>>>>> but just talks. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have started the work over migrating these service keeping in mind >>>>>> for inbuilt security with key focus on developer ready. >>>>>> >>>>>> The key idea is that any FI could develop in any lang or framework can >>>>>> utilise the today framework like we have in built consensus layer that >>>>>> keeps the data consistency in place. >>>>>> >>>>>> Its easier for payment rails to utilise such logs that are immutable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah I think Fineract 1.x is there its more solid then Fineract CN . >>>>>> >>>>>> If you wish to have more discussion around technology that works for >>>>>> practical use case reach out to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Life is a chess game - Anonymous.
