-1 binding All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner). Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a long term sustainable solution.
New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar reasoning. On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <jamespdai...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 binding > > (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes) > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bgo...@mifos.org> wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic < >>> chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 binding >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jdai...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w >>>>> the Fineract-CN project? >>>>> discussion was held on list in December. >>>>> >>>>> Vote +1 , -1, or 0 >>>>> Members of PMC indicate as binding >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
