-1 binding

All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner).
Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor
code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a
long term sustainable solution.

New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable
savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just
because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar
reasoning.

On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <jamespdai...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes)
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bgo...@mifos.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <
>>> chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jdai...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w
>>>>> the Fineract-CN project?
>>>>> discussion was held on list in December.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote +1 , -1, or 0
>>>>> Members of PMC indicate as binding
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to