+1
From: Avik Ganguly<mailto:a...@fynarfin.io> Sent: Sunday, 07 January 2024 16:05 To: dev@fineract.apache.org<mailto:dev@fineract.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos -1 binding All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner). Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a long term sustainable solution. New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar reasoning. On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <jamespdai...@gmail.com<mailto:jamespdai...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 binding (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes) On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bgo...@mifos.org<mailto:bgo...@mifos.org>> wrote: +1 binding On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid> wrote: +1 binding On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic <chee...@monkeysintown.com<mailto:chee...@monkeysintown.com>> wrote: +1 binding On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jdai...@apache.org<mailto:jdai...@apache.org>> wrote: Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the Fineract-CN project? discussion was held on list in December. Vote +1 , -1, or 0 Members of PMC indicate as binding
