Voting closed after four days. Results: +1 binding. Five votes. (Petri, James, Aleks, Javier, Bharath) +1 community. (Honest) -1 binding. One vote. (Avik)
We have the necessary quorum (six binding votes), the resolution has passed by more than 2/3rd majority, and I will be informing Infra. In this case, we are proceeding without unanimous agreement. While this is not ideal, I thank everyone for giving their opinions honestly. Hopefully we move forward together. On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 10:48 AM Honest Chirozva <hon...@taatconsulting.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > *From: *Avik Ganguly <a...@fynarfin.io> > *Sent: *Sunday, 07 January 2024 16:05 > *To: *dev@fineract.apache.org > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Archive CN repos > > > > -1 binding > > > > All repos should not be archived (Ex:- accounting, template, provisioner). > Regression across modules, flaky integration tests, difficult to refactor > code are consequences of the architecture and current architecture is not a > long term sustainable solution. > > > > New modules like overdraft/buy now pay later or scalable > savings/current/checking accounts should not be built in Fineract just > because of maturity of reporting module, UI components and other similar > reasoning. > > > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 7:18 AM James Dailey <jamespdai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 binding > > (Keeping vote open 72 hrs per procedure but we have enough votes) > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:56 AM Bharath Gowda <bgo...@mifos.org> wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 5:35 PM Petri Tuomola <pe...@tuomola.org.invalid> > wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 19:50, Aleksandar Vidakovic < > chee...@monkeysintown.com> wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 12:14 PM James Dailey <jdai...@apache.org> wrote: > > Shall we now request infra at Apache to archive the repos associated w the > Fineract-CN project? > > discussion was held on list in December. > > > > Vote +1 , -1, or 0 > > Members of PMC indicate as binding > > > > > > >
