Actually, I have to check into this but if adobe has publicly
available SWCs that the new asdoc generator could load and parse the
DITA with their documentation, adding Flash Player documentation is
possible.
I'm speaking from ignorance here and I would have to investigate if
the playerglobal.swc somewhere has asdocs embedded.
Mike
Quoting Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>:
Quoting Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:
Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core classes (which I
mentioned in the other thread I started).
I answered this, the only way to get core classes is by creating a
new asdoc that parses and renders the API from SWCs which I know is
possible, this way you get the API. I see no real option of getting
the descriptions with those, only code generated links that point to
the Adobe livedocs for each member etc which would be really akward.
I've also used the filter in the Adobe ASDocs based on Flash/AIR
version on occasion. For the classes where it matters, those
filters are useful.
The current template for asdoc does not have all the JavaScript for
filtering. At the moment this is impossible.
If we're picking the ASDocs apart, I'd add a padding to the Apache
Flex logo at the top right and probably make it a bit smaller?
I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer.
Harbs
On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has
less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
different machines. I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..
By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2
hours to process it. It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S
-Nick
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
<apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote:
Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only
selectively
check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied
branches of the
10000's of framework files and tests.
In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to
keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and links
in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to
Object but not the descriptions.
Mike
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
