What do you really mean by "on our website"?  Couldn't we point to a copy on
people@a.o or even in our SVN?


On 1/14/13 5:08 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote:

> Unfortunately, the only way to get stuff to our website is through the CMS.
>  Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint, I
> would rather keep them on our domain.
> 
> -Nick
> 
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote:
> 
>> I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
>> questioning if having them in the CMS is our only option.
>> 
>> As you said, republishing them kills the build and that proves there must
>> be some other option or hosting solution.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>:
>> 
>>  Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we
>>> have
>>> to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
>>> different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
>>> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
>>> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..
>>> 
>>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2
>>> hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S
>>> 
>>> -Nick
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
>>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>**wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
>>>> 
>>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
>>>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
>>>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only
>>>> selectively
>>>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches of
>>>> the
>>>> 10000's of framework files and tests.
>>>> 
>>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to
>>>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
>>>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and links
>>>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
>>>> 
>>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to
>>>> Object but not the descriptions.
>>>> 
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> --
>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>> 
>> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to