It would be nice. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:apa...@teotigraphix.com] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:03 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Actually, I have to check into this but if adobe has publicly available SWCs that the new asdoc generator could load and parse the DITA with their documentation, adding Flash Player documentation is possible. I'm speaking from ignorance here and I would have to investigate if the playerglobal.swc somewhere has asdocs embedded. Mike Quoting Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>: > > Quoting Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > >> Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core classes (which I >> mentioned in the other thread I started). > > I answered this, the only way to get core classes is by creating a new > asdoc that parses and renders the API from SWCs which I know is > possible, this way you get the API. I see no real option of getting > the descriptions with those, only code generated links that point to > the Adobe livedocs for each member etc which would be really akward. > > >> I've also used the filter in the Adobe ASDocs based on Flash/AIR >> version on occasion. For the classes where it matters, those filters >> are useful. > > The current template for asdoc does not have all the JavaScript for > filtering. At the moment this is impossible. > > >> If we're picking the ASDocs apart, I'd add a padding to the Apache >> Flex logo at the top right and probably make it a bit smaller? > > I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer. > > >> Harbs >> >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote: >> >>> I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has less >>> clutter than the adobe ones and load faster. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as] >>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55 >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs >>> >>> Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, >>> we have to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 >>> copies for my 8 different machines. I asked infra on IRC to see >>> about the possibility to get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't >>> run through the CMS or something to that effect, and they didn't like the idea.. >>> >>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about >>> 2 hours to process it. It also causes the buildbot process to crash >>> ;S >>> >>> -Nick >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle >>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea? >>>> >>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have >>>> another solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a >>>> broadband connection just to change my site info. This is also why >>>> I only selectively check out whiteboard folders so I don't get >>>> multiple copied branches of the 10000's of framework files and >>>> tests. >>>> >>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason >>>> to keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new >>>> ASDOc tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the >>>> entries and links in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs. >>>> >>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up >>>> to Object but not the descriptions. >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>> >>>> >> >> > > -- > Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC > http://www.teotigraphix.com > http://blog.teotigraphix.com > > -- Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com http://blog.teotigraphix.com
