>From what I understand, the experimental swc had a different namespace... I don't think it was in spark yet....
-Nick On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. I'm talking about experimental. > > I linked to the 4.9 release and s:Alert and s:ColorPicker were not > available. I'm using the en_US locale. Not sure what to say here… > > This is all clear as mud to me. I'll play around a bit trying to wrap my > head around this. I'll probably come back with more questions later… > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > > > Harbs, > > > >> 2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9 > release. > > > > If you're talking about the ones in the experimental.swc, there are in > the 4.9 but you can use them with en_US only, I re-worked them in the > develop branch, so if you want to use them and even to have an SDK you can > use with IntelliJ, constantly updated, chekout the develop branch, do a > first build, a release, use the makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder on the > released develop branch itself, not the resulting binaries. > > > > Like that you can set this fresh SDK as the SDK you use if you want to > make change in the SDK, you'll have only to run the ant target > corresponding to the lib you modified (and the other.locales too) and > you'll be able to test it right away on your sample projects. > > > > Ask me if I haven't been completly clear. > > > > -Fred > > > > -----Message d'origine----- From: Justin Mclean > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:27 AM > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Getting source working in Flash Builder > > > > Hi, > > > >> I did use the installer. > > Which would of given you last release 4.9. > > > >> The issue is that I'm trying to use the source rather than the > distribution for two reasons: > >> 1) I wanted to look into the TLF bugs that were reported. > >> 2) I need the Alert and ColorPicker components that's not in the 4.9 > release. > > > > Make a release build from the source with ant release, copy and > unzip/untar the release and use the script in the IDE directory to make an > SDK usable for Flash Builder or any other IDE. > > > >> Does the source need to be compiled before it can work? > > Um yes. The source gets compiled in swcs (in the frameworks/lib > directory) that your Flex application uses. > > > >> I wonder if now would be a good time to try InteliJ IDEA... > > You would still have the package the SDK up, your issue is not unique to > just Flash Builder. > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > Justin > >
