Quoting Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>:
Mike,
I got a snow ball full of ice hitting my face directly. If we would have
talked a bit first at least I could have ducked (prepared to refactor my
Yes, mea culpa on the communication.
My project is kind of NDA at the moment but completely uses the compiler.jx
platform. This is what I have been talking about "I am working on other
projects". I actually mean, I am working on other projects that plug into
THIS framework.
As a mental exercise, purely out of curiosity - as I just promised "it
won't happen again" - would you try to veto changes to an Apache Flex
project when those changes negatively affect a private, non-open
source project?
No, I would not, I am sending an email right now that would explain a
veto on this commit. I would never veto something based on something
you couldn't see. BTW what I am working on WILL be 100% open source
when it is released...
In light of our newly re-found communication (:-)), which parts of
this framework do your private projects rely on? Can I hack away at
the MXML stuff without bothering you too much? And, maybe more
importantly, will you be donating improvements you make to your local
copy of the framework back to Apache and if so, how might those
improvements influence the code that's based upon the current version
of the framework?
Erik, this had nothing to do with my project It had to do with I
disagreed with your changes(some of them). Having an external project
that uses the framework amplified my reason for disagreement, but I
still would have disagreed without that project.
There is no local copy! The framework is solid man, I am up to date on
all my commits with falcon.jx. I am not developing anything in secret
regarding the actual falcon.jx project.
BTW, did you mean to commit the SWC in the repository?
I meant to commit all the FlexJS files and dependencies for the
moment, until I have broken it down into their separate pieces and
written test for all of them. I didn't however realize that the swc
was a binary, thanks for pointing that out. I'll remove it from the
repo on my next commit.
Now, moving forward: I'll be doing a lot of work on any file that has
MXML in it's name. Do you foresee any problems with that? I might also
need to make minor modifications to some of the supporting files. When
do you consider a change worthy of discussion?
No, go for it, see above, I have no "hidden" branch of falcon.jx.
Mike
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
