On 2/28/13 4:22 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <apa...@teotigraphix.com> wrote: > > I want 1451312 reverted > > "Another major refactoring, but..." > > Right, WAY TO MAJOR. This was to much to change in one commit. > > Mike > I'm not sure this counts as a technical reason. Is there a technical issue with the refactoring? If the problem is that it made it hard for you to contribute to the code because you have to figure out where everything moved to, that is a concern worth voicing, but if the refactoring has technical merit then I don't think he has to revert. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Alex Harui
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Alex Harui
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Justin Mclean
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring pack... Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring packages Alex Harui
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring pack... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring ... Michael Schmalle
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring ... Fréderic Cox
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring ... Erik de Bruin
- Re: [FalconJx] Refactoring ... Michael Schmalle