Also,
He should revert commit 1451144 because he put a binary SWC in the
repo which is a no no, and well dam I would just like some input on
this refactoring stuff before it changes since this project is still
developing.
Commit and review could end up be a serious setback with this project
if it happens this way.
Mike
Quoting Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>:
I want 1451312 reverted
"Another major refactoring, but..."
Right, WAY TO MAJOR. This was to much to change in one commit.
Mike
Quoting Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
I not been following the exact changes here, but any changes to SVN
can be reverted if need be and any committer can veto a check in if
they feel there's a valid reason for doing so. That's part of the
commit then review process we have.
Can you discuss the changes made on list and come up with a way to
solve this?
Thanks,
Justin
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com
