On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Om, you seem to know what needs to be done, can you make sure the required > changes get made? > > I will as soon as we arrive at consensus here. Infra requests usually take time and I want to get what we want in one go :-) Thanks, Om > > On 5/13/13 11:10 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>>> Other than that we should not spend more time on this 'issue'. > >>> This is an issue because it's seen by the wider community. I agree it's > >> mostly > >>> irrelevant to active committers but it is an issue for someone who does > >> a pull > >>> request and that request is ignored for several months. It an issue > >> because > >>> github says no changes have happened in the project for 3 months (and > >> people > >>> tweet about it) when the actual fact is that changes happen every other > >> day. > >> A quick tour of search results shows that there is no way to get the > graph > >> to show a branch > > > > > > This is a quirk of GitHub. Once the default branch is changed to > > 'develop', the graphs will start showing activity for develop. > > > > > > > >> but implies that we will see all the last several months of > >> activity in the graph when we merge the next release with trunk/master. > >> Maybe that's one reason Cordova releases every month, or at least it is > a > >> side benefit? > >> > >> So let's see if we can get this next release out ASAP. And then if > GitHub > >> refuses to show activity then I would vote to not use GitHub as a > mirror. > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Harui > >> Flex SDK Team > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >> > >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
