Hi Om, In fact in our writable repo, doesn't have any branch called trunk, but we have one in Github, and is the default branch (this is the origin of this thread). -- Jose Barragan Chief Software Architect Codeoscopic Madrid C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. Planta 5. 505. 28020 Madrid. Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80
On May 13, 2013, at 8:31 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Can we do it in two pieces? The first part is the subject of this email: >> Can we get the "develop" branch as the default and the graphs showing the >> "develop" branch activity? > > > I guess you meant this for flex-sdk. What about the others? Maybe we > should list them and get everything set up properly at the same time. > > >> I guess that could also include removal of the >> "trunk" if that's old SVN stuff. I think we have consensus on this? >> > > Not sure what you mean by 'removal of trunk'. If we remove it from our > apache git repo, it will automatically be removed from the GitHub mirror > during the next sync. We dont need to ask Infra for this. > > That brings us to the question - do we really want to remove the 'trunk' > branch? That is where the SVN history is (we were doing active development > on the svn trunk for a period of time) > > We can remove it if we are okay with going back to our old, now read-only > SVN repo for any related history. > > > >> >> The second part is about pull requests, and I think that will require some >> experimentation and will take longer to settle. >> >> Did I miss a topic? Anyway, if you agree, can you take care of that first >> part? >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> On 5/13/13 11:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Om, you seem to know what needs to be done, can you make sure the >> required >>>> changes get made? >>>> >>>> >>> I will as soon as we arrive at consensus here. Infra requests usually >> take >>> time and I want to get what we want in one go :-) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Om >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 5/13/13 11:10 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Other than that we should not spend more time on this 'issue'. >>>>>>> This is an issue because it's seen by the wider community. I agree >> it's >>>>>> mostly >>>>>>> irrelevant to active committers but it is an issue for someone who >> does >>>>>> a pull >>>>>>> request and that request is ignored for several months. It an issue >>>>>> because >>>>>>> github says no changes have happened in the project for 3 months (and >>>>>> people >>>>>>> tweet about it) when the actual fact is that changes happen every >> other >>>>>> day. >>>>>> A quick tour of search results shows that there is no way to get the >>>> graph >>>>>> to show a branch >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is a quirk of GitHub. Once the default branch is changed to >>>>> 'develop', the graphs will start showing activity for develop. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> but implies that we will see all the last several months of >>>>>> activity in the graph when we merge the next release with >> trunk/master. >>>>>> Maybe that's one reason Cordova releases every month, or at least it >> is >>>> a >>>>>> side benefit? >>>>>> >>>>>> So let's see if we can get this next release out ASAP. And then if >>>> GitHub >>>>>> refuses to show activity then I would vote to not use GitHub as a >>>> mirror. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alex Harui >>>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alex Harui >>>> Flex SDK Team >>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Team >> Adobe Systems, Inc. >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> >>
