On 5/13/13 11:31 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we do it in two pieces? The first part is the subject of this email:
>> Can we get the "develop" branch as the default and the graphs showing the
>> "develop" branch activity?
>
>
> I guess you meant this for flex-sdk. What about the others? Maybe we
> should list them and get everything set up properly at the same time.
OK, can you do that? Or is there controversy?
Flex-falcon and flex-asjs are also using develop branches
Flex-tlf is not and there isn't much activity there
Same for flex-external.
>
>
>> I guess that could also include removal of the
>> "trunk" if that's old SVN stuff. I think we have consensus on this?
>>
>
> Not sure what you mean by 'removal of trunk'. If we remove it from our
> apache git repo, it will automatically be removed from the GitHub mirror
> during the next sync. We dont need to ask Infra for this.
>
> That brings us to the question - do we really want to remove the 'trunk'
> branch? That is where the SVN history is (we were doing active development
> on the svn trunk for a period of time)
>
> We can remove it if we are okay with going back to our old, now read-only
> SVN repo for any related history.
OK, sounds like we can skip this for now.
>
>
>
>>
>> The second part is about pull requests, and I think that will require some
>> experimentation and will take longer to settle.
>>
>> Did I miss a topic? Anyway, if you agree, can you take care of that first
>> part?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 5/13/13 11:17 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Om, you seem to know what needs to be done, can you make sure the
>> required
>>>> changes get made?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I will as soon as we arrive at consensus here. Infra requests usually
>> take
>>> time and I want to get what we want in one go :-)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/13/13 11:10 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other than that we should not spend more time on this 'issue'.
>>>>>>> This is an issue because it's seen by the wider community. I agree
>> it's
>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>> irrelevant to active committers but it is an issue for someone who
>> does
>>>>>> a pull
>>>>>>> request and that request is ignored for several months. It an issue
>>>>>> because
>>>>>>> github says no changes have happened in the project for 3 months (and
>>>>>> people
>>>>>>> tweet about it) when the actual fact is that changes happen every
>> other
>>>>>> day.
>>>>>> A quick tour of search results shows that there is no way to get the
>>>> graph
>>>>>> to show a branch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a quirk of GitHub. Once the default branch is changed to
>>>>> 'develop', the graphs will start showing activity for develop.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> but implies that we will see all the last several months of
>>>>>> activity in the graph when we merge the next release with
>> trunk/master.
>>>>>> Maybe that's one reason Cordova releases every month, or at least it
>> is
>>>> a
>>>>>> side benefit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So let's see if we can get this next release out ASAP. And then if
>>>> GitHub
>>>>>> refuses to show activity then I would vote to not use GitHub as a
>>>> mirror.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alex Harui
>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>
>>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
