Let's vote!

EdB



On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Vote is required according to [1]
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#new-mailing-list
>
> On 5/28/13 11:45 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>
>>Shouldn't everyone be able to subscribe? Or are you saying that but
>>did I miss it... ;-)
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:32 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>><bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Okay, moving to a new thread.
>>>
>>> Do we need a vote for this or is there sufficient consensus in the
>>> community?
>>>
>>> We dont want to lose people because of all the spam that gets generated
>>>by
>>> the JIRA emails.  That should be a big priority for us.
>>>
>>> The proposal is:
>>>
>>> 1.  Create a list: j...@flex.apache.org.
>>> 2.  All JIRA emails generated by
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX will
>>> go to j...@flex.apache.org
>>> 3.  No JIRA emails will be sent to dev@flex.apache.org
>>> 4.  We add all committers and PMC members to the j...@flex.apache.org
>>>list
>>> 5.  When a new committer/PMC member is inducted, we add them to the
>>> j...@flex.apache.org as one of the setup activities.
>>>
>>> Any comments/suggestions?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 on the JIRA on another list, do we need a vote on that, or can we
>>>> just ask INFRA for it?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe this discussion should be in a separate thread, however...
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
>>>><nicho...@spoon.as>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > I would prefer JIRA activity to be on another list.  I've heard from
>>>> quite
>>>> > a few people in my User Group that they dropped off dev@ people of
>>>>the
>>>> > noise of JIRA.   I think those of us who want to know what is
>>>>committed
>>>> > will subscribe to those (plus, it makes filtering those messages
>>>>into a
>>>> > separate folder easier ;P  )
>>>> >
>>>> > -Nick
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On 5/28/13 10:25 AM, "Greg Reddin" <gred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of
>>>>being
>>>> >> >> integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project?
>>>>Personally,
>>>> >> >>I'd
>>>> >> >> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of
>>>>Flex-related
>>>> >> >>code
>>>> >> >> even if there is no active development for it.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >There's a couple of things to consider here:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >1) The board does not favor "umbrella" projects. Jakarta was an
>>>> umbrella
>>>> >> >project and it contained (at one time) Struts, Tomcat, Commons,
>>>>JMeter,
>>>> >> >and
>>>> >> >a whole bunch of Java-related projects. It became clear that the
>>>> Jakarta
>>>> >> >community was too fragmented to get consensus so it spun off all
>>>>those
>>>> >> >projects into TLPs. That could easily start to happen here.
>>>> >> That would make sense for Jakarta, especially if there was active
>>>> >> development on all of those pieces.  I'm not sure that will be the
>>>>case
>>>> >> here.  I think there's a good chance that these application
>>>>frameworks
>>>> may
>>>> >> not have much activity.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> For me, incubation was so much work that it seems easier to take
>>>>these
>>>> >> code donations and see if a community forms around it and then spin
>>>>it
>>>> off
>>>> >> than going through the whole
>>>> >> proposal/initial-committers/mentors/infra-setup/graduation process.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >2) This mailing list is already too high-traffic to follow.
>>>> Practically,
>>>> >> >we
>>>> >> >could probably already split up the Flex project into multiple
>>>> projects.
>>>> >> >It
>>>> >> >seems to me that folks are starting to gel around different
>>>>efforts,
>>>> like
>>>> >> >getting new releases of the SDK, vs. compilers, etc. It could be
>>>>that
>>>> we
>>>> >> >need to form new PMCs or it could be that we just need to enact
>>>> >> >sub-projects. But we have to be careful with sub-projects to avoid
>>>> point 1
>>>> >> >above.
>>>> >> What are your thoughts on just having more mailing lists?  We toyed
>>>>with
>>>> >> the notion of having all JIRA activity on a different list.  I
>>>>haven't
>>>> >> looked at the stats, but Erik and I haven't done much
>>>> >> Falcon/FalconJX/FlexJS work over the last two weeks and I'm not sure
>>>> >> there's been less activity on the dev list.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -Alex
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295
>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>



-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Reply via email to