It's going to make filtering the emails a lot easier now... gmail does a
poor job compared to my outlook.

-Mark


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> Agreed. Committers are committing, so they want to track the issues
> they work on anyways, I'm sure. If they hate being kept up to date so
> much, they can always unsubscribe. This is not a big thing, it's just
> a mailing list.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:58 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <
> nicho...@spoon.as>wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think we need to auto-add committers... Let them add themselves,
> >> incase they either don't want the notices (and view them via RSS direct
> >> from JIRA), or they want to use another email address.  It should be a
> >> public list so anybody could join if they want.
> >>
> >> -Nick
> >>
> >>
> > What if no one subscribes to this list?  Or what if a few people
> subscribe
> > and then they all go inactive?
> > The reason we need to auto-add committers is that we want to make sure
> that
> > a committed set of people are always watching JIRA activity.  I dont see
> a
> > way to do this without adding all committers automatically.
> >
> > It should be easy enough for all email clients to create a per email
> filter
> > (j...@flex.apache.org) in this case.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:32 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >> <bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Okay, moving to a new thread.
> >> >
> >> > Do we need a vote for this or is there sufficient consensus in the
> >> > community?
> >> >
> >> > We dont want to lose people because of all the spam that gets
> generated
> >> by
> >> > the JIRA emails.  That should be a big priority for us.
> >> >
> >> > The proposal is:
> >> >
> >> > 1.  Create a list: j...@flex.apache.org.
> >> > 2.  All JIRA emails generated by
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX will
> >> > go to j...@flex.apache.org
> >> > 3.  No JIRA emails will be sent to dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > 4.  We add all committers and PMC members to the
> jira@flex.apache.orglist
> >> > 5.  When a new committer/PMC member is inducted, we add them to the
> >> > j...@flex.apache.org as one of the setup activities.
> >> >
> >> > Any comments/suggestions?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Om
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1 on the JIRA on another list, do we need a vote on that, or can we
> >> > > just ask INFRA for it?
> >> > >
> >> > > Maybe this discussion should be in a separate thread, however...
> >> > >
> >> > > EdB
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <
> >> nicho...@spoon.as
> >> > >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > I would prefer JIRA activity to be on another list.  I've heard
> from
> >> > > quite
> >> > > > a few people in my User Group that they dropped off dev@ people
> of
> >> the
> >> > > > noise of JIRA.   I think those of us who want to know what is
> >> committed
> >> > > > will subscribe to those (plus, it makes filtering those messages
> >> into a
> >> > > > separate folder easier ;P  )
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Nick
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On 5/28/13 10:25 AM, "Greg Reddin" <gred...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> >On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >>
> >> > > >> >> Greg, do you think donations like these need to have a goal of
> >> > being
> >> > > >> >> integrated with Apache Flex or becoming its own project?
> >> >  Personally,
> >> > > >> >>I'd
> >> > > >> >> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of
> >> > Flex-related
> >> > > >> >>code
> >> > > >> >> even if there is no active development for it.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >There's a couple of things to consider here:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >1) The board does not favor "umbrella" projects. Jakarta was an
> >> > > umbrella
> >> > > >> >project and it contained (at one time) Struts, Tomcat, Commons,
> >> > JMeter,
> >> > > >> >and
> >> > > >> >a whole bunch of Java-related projects. It became clear that the
> >> > > Jakarta
> >> > > >> >community was too fragmented to get consensus so it spun off all
> >> > those
> >> > > >> >projects into TLPs. That could easily start to happen here.
> >> > > >> That would make sense for Jakarta, especially if there was active
> >> > > >> development on all of those pieces.  I'm not sure that will be
> the
> >> > case
> >> > > >> here.  I think there's a good chance that these application
> >> frameworks
> >> > > may
> >> > > >> not have much activity.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> For me, incubation was so much work that it seems easier to take
> >> these
> >> > > >> code donations and see if a community forms around it and then
> spin
> >> it
> >> > > off
> >> > > >> than going through the whole
> >> > > >> proposal/initial-committers/mentors/infra-setup/graduation
> process.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> >2) This mailing list is already too high-traffic to follow.
> >> > > Practically,
> >> > > >> >we
> >> > > >> >could probably already split up the Flex project into multiple
> >> > > projects.
> >> > > >> >It
> >> > > >> >seems to me that folks are starting to gel around different
> >> efforts,
> >> > > like
> >> > > >> >getting new releases of the SDK, vs. compilers, etc. It could be
> >> that
> >> > > we
> >> > > >> >need to form new PMCs or it could be that we just need to enact
> >> > > >> >sub-projects. But we have to be careful with sub-projects to
> avoid
> >> > > point 1
> >> > > >> >above.
> >> > > >> What are your thoughts on just having more mailing lists?  We
> toyed
> >> > with
> >> > > >> the notion of having all JIRA activity on a different list.  I
> >> haven't
> >> > > >> looked at the stats, but Erik and I haven't done much
> >> > > >> Falcon/FalconJX/FlexJS work over the last two weeks and I'm not
> sure
> >> > > >> there's been less activity on the dev list.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -Alex
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Ix Multimedia Software
> >> > >
> >> > > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >> > > 3521 VB Utrecht
> >> > >
> >> > > T. 06-51952295
> >> > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>

Reply via email to