I'm with Erik here too, fix it in develop + branch both issues.
On 30 July 2013 07:57, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > Same here: > > Permission error on the download and the FB 4.7 location seems to be > "eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722" > > ??? > > EdB > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:50 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala > <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Same here. Getting a "*Server Problem**Unknown server error.* Try again > or > > contact the server administrator." > > > > Also, the folder in my FB installation > > is eclipse\plugins\com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722 > > > > This is on Windows 7, FB 4.7 64-bit > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Swen van Zanten <f...@hdsign.nl> > wrote: > > > >> I have tried downloading the file.. but the browser says I have no > >> permission.. > >> Also in your readme the folder that is pointed to is: > >> eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flash.codemodel_4.7.0.349722 > >> But on my machine it is: > >> eclipse/plugins/com.adobe.flexbuilder.codemodel_4.7.0.349722 > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> SWEN VAN ZANTEN > >> Hoofdstraat 160 > >> 2171 BL, Sassenheim > >> > >> Op 30 jul. 2013, om 08:04 heeft Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> het > >> volgende geschreven: > >> > >> > Even later update on the "New Project" issue: > >> > > >> > I think I have successfully patched a jar in FlashBuilder to get > around > >> > this problem. > >> > > >> > The patched jar and a readme is up on > >> > http://people.apache.org/~aharui/FlashBuilder/ > >> > > >> > Can a few folks try it so we know it works? I think it will only work > >> > with FlashBuilder 4.7 (and not 4.6). Then we'll discuss what to do > next. > >> > > >> > -Alex > >> > > >> > On 7/29/13 5:45 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Latest update on the "New Project" issue: > >> >> > >> >> I think I've found the offending code for real this time. There is > code > >> >> for a version check that checks that the Flex version is less than > 5.0.0 > >> >> by doing: > >> >> > >> >> major * 100 + minor * 10 + micro > >> >> > >> >> This means that we don't have the option to change to Apache Flex > 5.0.0 > >> to > >> >> get around this problem, and further means that someday when we > really > >> >> mean to do 5.0 we'll have this problem again. > >> >> > >> >> There is a class called MXMLVersion2009.java that creates an > instance of > >> >> org.osgi.Framework.Version like this: > >> >> > >> >> init(..., ..., > >> >> new Version(4,5,0), new Version(5,0,0), new > Version(4,0,0)); > >> >> > >> >> It looks like the expectation was that these versions would get > updated > >> >> when FB had synchronized releases with Adobe Flex SDKs. We need to > go > >> in > >> >> an change that 5 to something larger somehow. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I am passing the same information on to the FB team at Adobe. > >> >> > >> >> -Alex > >> >> > >> >> On 7/29/13 7:46 AM, "Scott Guthmann" <sc...@on3solutions.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>>> I am hoping we're going to release something other than RC3 which > >> means > >> >>>> we have a few more days before we would release. Here's my latest > >> >>>> update on the 3 issues: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 1) ResourceModule via FlashVars: Yes it affects a small > population of > >> >>>> the total Flex SWFs in the world, but at least two of folks who > took > >> the > >> >>>> time to try the RC found it. I have a fix ready to go. > >> >>>> 2) This FB Issue. I am trying to get a response from the FB team. > >> And > >> >>>> I'm looking through their source to try to find the actual cause. > If > >> we > >> >>>> cut another RC, we should at minimum update the release notes in > the > >> >>>>> kits themselves to describe this issue and its workaround. But > maybe > >> >>>>> by the time we get the next RC ready we'll have more information. > >> >>>> 3) The Ilist issue. The bug author's workaround was to stop using > >> >>>> DataList. Not everyone has the luxury of doing that, so IMO, we > >> really > >> >>>> don't have a workaround. And this will affect LCDS customers. I > >> think > >> >>>> we >should revert the change to Ilist, but we don't have to revert > the > >> >>>> change to ListCollectionView. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> So, I would prefer we cut another RC at least to address #1 and #3, > >> and > >> >>>> maybe we'll come up with a better plan for #2 during that time. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -Alex > >> >>> > >> >>> To release or not to release - that is the question.... > >> >>> +1 to Alex's approach. Strategically, it is better to release > something > >> >>> that provides developers with a good user experience. Releasing > >> something > >> >>> that requires deletion of files to work right or a patch to several > of > >> >>> the IDEs that are standard is a bad idea. Some of the goals we > should > >> >>> have when we test to determine if the RC should move forward: 1) > Does > >> the > >> >>> SDK RC work smoothly on mac, windows, and Linux? 2) Does the AIR > >> >>> installer work smoothly on mac, windows, and linux? 3) do the binary > >> >>> distributions work smoothly on each of these platforms? 4) Are the > >> manual > >> >>> builds of the SDK and the binary versions supported by the top IDEs: > >> >>> IntelliJ, Flash Builder, Flash Develop, and FDT? > >> >>> > >> >>> My opinion is that we are not adequately evaluating if the RC > versions > >> >>> are meeting these developer user experience questions when voting > on an > >> >>> them. The community millions of devs are not as capable of the > >> patching & > >> >>> work arounds as you guys are. The best marketing you can do is > >> creating a > >> >>> feature rich product that is easy to use for any skill level - make > it > >> >>> simple (which is difficult to do). > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- João Fernandes
