> > > I think when you use the new installer to install FlexJS it is following > > the same nightly build pattern that we do for the main SDK. If you think > > we're in violation, please be more specific about what we need to change. > > IMO without an actual release we could be in violation yes. We are > providing to user unreleased software for which there is no official Apache > release. > > Would be straight forward to make and vote on alpha releases? (see same > link just a little further down the page). > > > Why can't the installer install nightly builds? It already does for the > > main SDK. > We have an official release for that - and most people choose the > 4.10/4.11 release (see google stats). There probably should be an addition > disclaimer there as well "This is not an official release and for > development use only". I'm not 100% sure we can do that for the other > packages as there no official release yet. > > I think a disclaimer should be enough. Lets not make it harder than required. If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release. If we cannot make a release more people cannot test it.
I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested. FlexJS has been touched by very very few people. As discussed earlier, a convenience binary downloaded from Alex's people page does not violate Apache rules. Thanks, Om > Thanks, > Justin
