On 2/10/14 3:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builder that was pointed out several >> weeks ago. >But it's OK with the Adobe Flex 3.0 SDKs? Seems odd to me. If we name it 3.x then FB has other assumption about what SWCs are available. And we certainly can't get to 1 or 0.1. I tried it. You are welcome to try to find a workaround. > >> I think when you use the new installer to install FlexJS it is following >> the same nightly build pattern that we do for the main SDK. If you >>think >> we're in violation, please be more specific about what we need to >>change. > >IMO without an actual release we could be in violation yes. We are >providing to user unreleased software for which there is no official >Apache release. The 4.12 nightly and RC is also doing so. I didn't see anything in the link you referenced that having unreleased code based on released code is somehow better. However, it might be better if we have some sort of secret key we put on the dev list to add the nightly builds to the drop down list. That way we know you're following the dev list. Unless someone has a better idea, I'll add that to the next installer I push. -Alex
