On 2/10/14 3:53 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>The reasoning is that Flash Builder won't handle version numbers below 4. >> > >Ah, I forgot about Flash Builder and its idiosyncrasies. No way FB could >push out a patch for this? Doubt it. Plus folks may simply not have the patch. > > >> It might be possible that Flash Builder only reads the version from >> flex-sdk-description.xml and we can use 0.0.1 in the package names, but >>I >> don't know if that would be even more confusing when you go to install >>the >> SDK in FB. Someone suggested starting FlexJS with version 5, but that >> >might need testing. It would be great if someone could help out and try >> various permutations. >> > >What if the name of the software is "FlexJS 1.0" with 4.x in the >flex-sdk-description.xml. Would that be acceptable? Someone would have to try it to see how it feels. It be great of someone besides me could do that. My first thought is that you go and install FlexJS 1.0 or 0.1 then go to the Flash Builder import SDK screens and it offers up FlexJS 4.0 and you might get confused. But if folks feel that's better that's fine with me. -Alex
