At least two folks are currently struggling to get FlexJS installed properly.
In the next installer we should try to provide more info on where it failed. If you have time to work on that, please do, otherwise I will get around to it. -Alex On 5/19/14 12:25 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >I think the problems I was having were related to the Website contianing >the BlazeDS libs being insanely slow (Using the browser the page took up >to 10 Minutes to show). >This problem should have an effect on any installation. Also have I >noticed this poor performance beeng the regular mode of operation of that >server. >We could avoid this problem by releasing Apache BlazeDS and switching to >that. The Apache Servers should be able to handle the load. >Same with some of the libs. I have noticed the Ant scripts download a lot >of libs from project-servers. These tend to go offline now and then. I >would suggest to download these from Maven Central instead, as this will >probably even be online after the world explodes ;-) > >Chris > > >________________________________________ >Von: omup...@gmail.com <omup...@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash >Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >Gesendet: Montag, 19. Mai 2014 09:18 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Installer failure rate is way to high > >Here is the break down for the last 30 days: > > /track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK >4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=windows >1,458 >/track-installer.html?version=4.12.0&os=windows >1,105 >*/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache Flex SDK >4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=windows* >821 >/track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK 4.12.1&version=4.12.1&os=mac >505 >/track-installer.html?version=4.12.0&os=mac >375 >/track-installer.html?version=4.12.1&os=windows >363 >*/track-installer.html?failure=true&label=Apache FlexJS >0.0.1&version=0.0.1&os=windows* >350 >/track-installer.html?label=Apache FlexJS 0.0.1&version=0.0.1&os=windows >190 >/track-installer.html?label=Apache Flex SDK >4.12.0&version=4.12.0&os=windows >98 >/track-installer.html?version=4.12.1&os=mac >92 >Any ideas how to address this situation? Should we push a new release >with >more tracking (perhaps the install log)? > >Thanks, >Om
