On 5/19/14 11:35 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 19, 2014 11:28 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> I believe we don't know if the failure rate is lower with 2.7. It could >> simply be the same, especially if folks are getting as far as antlr, >>gcc, >> or some other third-party download before it fails. > >I meant bringing the old Installer back for the Flex SDK installation and >using the new Installer for FlexJS. Until we sort this out. How would that work? If someone gets 3.0 for FlexJS, they will end up using it for 4.12.2 unless they remember to downgrade? And again, it isn't clear to me that 2.7 doesn't have the same problems, it is just that failures are not reported in 2.7. > >I can add the console log tracking right away if you are okay with >releasing that as 3.0.1. Works? Any concerns the log gets too long or is too different so it is hard to track? I was going to try to add some status string to send. I'm wondering if we should rush this out or try to tackle some of the known issues that were reported like the streaming error and bad downloads. Let's see what others say. Thanks, -Alex
