On May 20, 2014 12:11 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Should we perhaps revert back to the earlier version of the Installer while > > we investigate this? > > It's not 100% certain that the old installer wasn't getting that many failures.
Not sure if I follow. Triple negatives are confusing. :-) >From what people have reported I'd assume the new installer is getting more errors but that's just a guess. Few people report errors is all we can take from this. > > Speaking of which if you start the installer without an internet connection it should not probably error in the way it does, I don't think this is a significant enough use case, is it? Thanks Om > > Thanks, > Justin
