Hi, >> At the very least this should of been discussed (and perhaps VOTEed on) >> before being implemented in 2 releases. > I don't think there is anything to discuss and vote on as long as it > doesn't violate policy. Nobody has to use it. I'm just offering it up as > a convenience.
It has already been used as the sole basis to cast a binding vote. Your vote email(s) don't give the impression is it optional, but in fact it is preferred. IMO Not discussing this in the open before implementing it and now putting in yet another vote before it being the issue resolved is not really community minded. Justin
