Did you actually look at the script and run it? It's like a wizard that steps you through the process rather than an automation of the process itself. It doesn't try take any responsibility away from the voter, quite the opposite actually: it makes sure the voter doesn't skip any part of the process.
And above all, it's just a utility, not a mandatory tool. Justin, this is exactly what we've been talking about on private@: unnecessary procedural stuff holding up the project. Let it be and let's move on. EdB On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Meanwhile, using the script or otherwise, can we vote on these packages? > > Currently I'm considering if I should the veto the checkin(s) or not. > - This approach was not discussed on the mailing list before being > introduced > - I'm not convinced that the script is enough to provide proper PMC > oversight > - There's a temptation to just use the script as the sole means to vote on > releases > > Thanks, > Justin > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
