On 6/17/14 2:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >>> At the very least this should of been discussed (and perhaps VOTEed on) >>> before being implemented in 2 releases. >> I don't think there is anything to discuss and vote on as long as it >> doesn't violate policy. Nobody has to use it. I'm just offering it up >>as >> a convenience. > >It has already been used as the sole basis to cast a binding vote. Your >vote email(s) don't give the impression is it optional, but in fact it is >preferred. My email says "can", not "must". And I think it is clear now that it is optional. > >IMO Not discussing this in the open before implementing it and now >putting in yet another vote before it being the issue resolved is not >really community minded. I'm sorry you feel that way. If others concur I will email an apology. Meanwhile, using the script or otherwise, can we vote on these packages? -Alex
