What steps did you take to set up an SDK with the recommended scripts. Did you unpack the source kit, run ant, then a particular script? Or unpack a binary kit? Or did you run the script in a repo branch?
IMO, lib/afe.jar and lib/aglj40.jar shouldn't be in an SDK. They should be in lib/external/optional. They are for the SDK I got via the installer. Could the scripts be broken? Anyway, at this point, I don't think this stuff needs to be fixed before releasing. Let's ship this one and move on. -Alex On 7/2/14 9:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >I notice there quite a bit of difference between resulting SDKs when >installing with installer and by the recommend scripts. > >After sorting out the noise - an SDK produced by the installer is missing: >- Anything to do with producing asdocs this includes asdoc files in >project sub directories >- All build.xml, .actionScript, .flexLibProerties, .project and other >build files >- flash-integration >- frameworks/themes Ice Institutional Smoke Wooden >- lib/afe.jar and lib/aglj40.jar >- licenses in /lib/external/optional afe-LICENSE.htm, >aglj40-LICENSE.htm, flex-fontkit-LICENSE.htm, >flex-messaging-common-LICENSE.htm, rideau.jar-LICENSE.htm > >Some of this may because we're not bundling stuff into the binary, but >others (afe.jar + aglj40.jar) look like an installer issue. > >Are we OK with all of this? > >Thanks, >Justin
