I think it has to be in public. This is open development. I'm hoping you will save me time by doing so. If we are doing something we shouldn't we should correct it now otherwise we'll waste time and energy doing more work in that direction only to find out that customers have the same feedback.
Not that all of your feedback is guaranteed to be addressed: there's always a chance that what you don't like is philosophical rather than technical. That's why there are dozens of JS frameworks already and why you want to try a different approach. -Alex On 7/3/14 12:00 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >You want to hear that in public, or do you want to take this off list? > >EdB > > > > >On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >I've been doing that as well for the last couple of years. I spent >>most of >> >my time getting FlexJS off the ground. But I don't agree with some of >>the >> >basic assumptions and choices that FlexJS has made. I said little or >> >nothing about it to give FlexJS a proper head start and to keep you and >> >Peter going. But now that I have re-evaluated what the project means to >> >me, >> >and what I would like to spend my time on when contributing, and I >>have to >> >give my take on Flex to JS a try. >> I'd love to hear your thoughts on what you don't agree with regarding >> FlexJS. >> >> -Alex >> >> > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
