I'm not sure what you mean by "philosophical". I see more similarities than differences between FlexJS and your approach of trying to mimic more of the current SDK in JS. In fact, I still hope to convince you that what you want to do is within the FlexJS charter so we can work together instead appearing to work on separate efforts. And then what you are working on would also be weakened by whatever it is you want to say. If you have a killer argument why folks should not be trying to compile MXML and AS to JS, I think the whole community will be better served by finding out why now.
-Alex On 7/7/14 8:40 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >There are no technical issues per se that would need addressing to keep >FlexJS healthy. I made sure of that. > >My argument is basically philosophical, and I think my ranting about it in >public would weaken FlexJS' case, so I won't. > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> I think it has to be in public. This is open development. I'm hoping >>you >> will save me time by doing so. If we are doing something we shouldn't >>we >> should correct it now otherwise we'll waste time and energy doing more >> work in that direction only to find out that customers have the same >> feedback. >> >> Not that all of your feedback is guaranteed to be addressed: there's >> always a chance that what you don't like is philosophical rather than >> technical. That's why there are dozens of JS frameworks already and why >> you want to try a different approach. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 7/3/14 12:00 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >You want to hear that in public, or do you want to take this off list? >> > >> >EdB >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >I've been doing that as well for the last couple of years. I spent >> >>most of >> >> >my time getting FlexJS off the ground. But I don't agree with some >>of >> >>the >> >> >basic assumptions and choices that FlexJS has made. I said little or >> >> >nothing about it to give FlexJS a proper head start and to keep you >>and >> >> >Peter going. But now that I have re-evaluated what the project >>means to >> >> >me, >> >> >and what I would like to spend my time on when contributing, and I >> >>have to >> >> >give my take on Flex to JS a try. >> >> I'd love to hear your thoughts on what you don't agree with regarding >> >> FlexJS. >> >> >> >> -Alex >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Ix Multimedia Software >> > >> >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >3521 VB Utrecht >> > >> >T. 06-51952295 >> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
