There are no technical issues per se that would need addressing to keep FlexJS healthy. I made sure of that.
My argument is basically philosophical, and I think my ranting about it in public would weaken FlexJS' case, so I won't. EdB On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > I think it has to be in public. This is open development. I'm hoping you > will save me time by doing so. If we are doing something we shouldn't we > should correct it now otherwise we'll waste time and energy doing more > work in that direction only to find out that customers have the same > feedback. > > Not that all of your feedback is guaranteed to be addressed: there's > always a chance that what you don't like is philosophical rather than > technical. That's why there are dozens of JS frameworks already and why > you want to try a different approach. > > -Alex > > On 7/3/14 12:00 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > >You want to hear that in public, or do you want to take this off list? > > > >EdB > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> >I've been doing that as well for the last couple of years. I spent > >>most of > >> >my time getting FlexJS off the ground. But I don't agree with some of > >>the > >> >basic assumptions and choices that FlexJS has made. I said little or > >> >nothing about it to give FlexJS a proper head start and to keep you and > >> >Peter going. But now that I have re-evaluated what the project means to > >> >me, > >> >and what I would like to spend my time on when contributing, and I > >>have to > >> >give my take on Flex to JS a try. > >> I'd love to hear your thoughts on what you don't agree with regarding > >> FlexJS. > >> > >> -Alex > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Ix Multimedia Software > > > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >3521 VB Utrecht > > > >T. 06-51952295 > >I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
