For clarification: New project MXML before current patch:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" layout="absolute" minWidth="955" minHeight="600"> </s:Application> New project MXML after current patch: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600"> <fx:Declarations> <!-- Place non-visual elements (e.g., services, value objects) here --> </fx:Declarations> </s:Application> (I see a deletion and an addition … ) New project MXML after hypothetical new patch: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" xmlns:xp="http://flex.apache.org/experimental/ns"; minWidth="955" minHeight="600"> <fx:Declarations> <!-- Place non-visual elements (e.g., services, value objects) here --> </fx:Declarations> </s:Application> Or, alternatively, we can opt to add the ‘apache’ namespace instead (doesn’t sound so scary), and move (some of) the experimental components into that: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" xmlns:af="http://flex.apache.org/ns"; minWidth="955" minHeight="600"> <fx:Declarations> <!-- Place non-visual elements (e.g., services, value objects) here --> </fx:Declarations> </s:Application> Thanks, EdB On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > I was just thinking: might it be possible to use the same hack/patch that > was used to fix the FB project file also be used to include the > ‘experimental’ namespace in the default project template? > > I think a lot of people don’t know about the ‘experimental’ namespace, and > if they do, are not sure how to use it. They are missing out on a lot of > really cool controls. > > I think the framework would really benefit this simple (?) addition … > > Thanks, > > EdB > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
