On Oct 1, 2014 2:07 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > The thing is, if I remember correctly, the consensus was that only > components with a comprehensive set of Mustella tests would be eligible for > ‘promotion’ … This pretty much rules out most of the experimental controls > ever doing so.
It should not be to hard to add new Mustella tests. So, I wouldn't rule that option out. > > Unless we are willing to debate loosening this requirement (which I think > we should consider), adding - if possible - the ‘experimental’ namespace to > the ‘project patch’ would be best. 'Best' would be to add Mustella tests for the new components. Thanks, Om > > EdB > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote: > > > On 01/10/14 07:34, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > > >> I think a lot of people don’t know about the ‘experimental’ namespace, and > >> if they do, are not sure how to use it. They are missing out on a lot of > >> really cool controls. > >> > > Isn't that the idea ? > > > > If there are a lot of cool things in experimental that people are using > > without issues, we should graduate them out of it, so to speak ? > > This will mean fixing their (MXML) interface but not a lot else ? > > > > Tom > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
