Hi, I’ve implemented after24’s patch and there were no objections from Mustella. The way I implemented the patch doesn’t automatically give the performance improvements he intended it to have. That is because I didn’t increase the default rate, but kept it at 30. After24 suggests that the performance is noticeably better with a value of 90.
Anyone mind if I increase the default from 30 to 90 and see if Mustella has issues with that? I think it’s worth it given the perceived performance improvement and my guess is that the possible side effects are small, given that the field we’re messing with was marked private. EdB On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > I applied the patch to ‘flex-sdk’. > > I left the default on 30, instead of the suggested 90, in order to reduce > the chance of side effects and to maintain backwards compatibility. > > We can always increase the default if the Mustella test don’t object to > the current change ;-) > > EdB > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:04 AM, after24 <vinc...@after24.net> wrote: > >> Hi Erik, >> >> Just added a proper patch. >> >> Have a nice day. >> >> Vincent. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Improvement-of-mobile-scrollings-tp41029p41107.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
