On Oct 7, 2014 11:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > I’ve implemented after24’s patch and there were no objections from > Mustella. The way I implemented the patch doesn’t automatically give the > performance improvements he intended it to have. That is because I didn’t > increase the default rate, but kept it at 30. After24 suggests that the > performance is noticeably better with a value of 90. > > Anyone mind if I increase the default from 30 to 90 and see if Mustella has > issues with that? I think it’s worth it given the perceived performance > improvement and my guess is that the possible side effects are small, given > that the field we’re messing with was marked private.
+1 Thanks, Om > > EdB > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > I applied the patch to ‘flex-sdk’. > > > > I left the default on 30, instead of the suggested 90, in order to reduce > > the chance of side effects and to maintain backwards compatibility. > > > > We can always increase the default if the Mustella test don’t object to > > the current change ;-) > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:04 AM, after24 <vinc...@after24.net> wrote: > > > >> Hi Erik, > >> > >> Just added a proper patch. > >> > >> Have a nice day. > >> > >> Vincent. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Improvement-of-mobile-scrollings-tp41029p41107.html > >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
