Like I said; I have not been using RSLs since I switched to Apache Flex, so I can’t comment one way or the other.
I guess it would be helpful if someone checks whether the behavior is actually different. On Jan 21, 2015, at 11:14 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > The RSL 'issue' Justin reports isn't a regression, it's been around since > 4.9... > > "Looks like the file is question is named > "textLayout_4.14.0.20150121.swf" not the expected > "textLayout_20150121.swf". > > The RSL in question has had the version number included since that > release: 'textLayout_4.9.1.1447119.swf'. If it's even an issue IRL at > all, no one has cared enough to even file a JIRA. > > It is not a blocker. > > EdB > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
