It's just installed now :-)
The files have the same names as mentioned in the config files:
tchiverton@ev34:/tmp/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.0-bin$ find . -iname
'textLayout*swf'
./frameworks/rsls/textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf
tchiverton@ev34:/tmp/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.0-bin$ grep -Hrn
textLayout_4.14.0.20150119 *
frameworks/air-config.xml:366:
<rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
frameworks/flex-config.xml:370:
<rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
ide/flashbuilder/config/flex-config.xml:370:
<rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
ide/flashbuilder/config/air-config.xml:366:
<rsl-url>textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf</rsl-url>
tchiverton@ev34:/tmp/apache-flex-sdk-4.14.0-bin$
And mxmlc prints out, for an RSL-enabled build of one of our apps:
Required RSLs:
....
textLayout_4.14.0.20150119.swf
....
The application trys to load the files from the names given by mxmlc, so
it works fine as long as you copy the RSLs as named.
Maybe Builder has an issue ? But looks OK to me,
Tom
On 21/01/15 09:08, Harbs wrote:
Okay. Can you confirm that it’s broken?
On Jan 21, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> wrote:
On 21/01/15 08:43, Harbs wrote:
RSLs are turned off by default and they do not really offer any performance
advantage using Apache Flex.
It depends on your use case. If you update your app more often than SDKs, you
can give you users a smaller download after app updates, at the cost of a
larger first run size.
YMMV, but we use them, so if they don't work the SDK is broken for us.
Tom
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
